- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Advocate columnist Matthew Harris believes Hill is done at LSU
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:49 am to danfraz
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:49 am to danfraz
quote:
He can and possible did violate his probation but once he's plead to a charge I think that's it. If the judge revokes probation he would serve time for the carnal knowledge thing
This is where discretion comes in. The judge doesn't have to revoke his probation, or she might. In deciding whether or not to revoke it, may she consider all the facts that surrounded his original plea deal -- the whole case -- or just the plea deal itself?
Obviously, I'm not proposing double jeopardy. I'm just saying there is discretion in how the court can handle this within the context of the plea deal. If he goes to jail, it would be carnal knowledge, not for sexual assault or, for that matter, punching a guy at a bar.
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 11:53 am
Posted on 7/9/13 at 11:52 am to CourseyCorridor
quote:
This is where discretion comes in. The judge doesn't have to send him to revoke his probation, but may she consider all the facts that surrounded his original plea deal -- the whole case -- or just the plea deal itself?
Obviously, I'm not proposing double jeopardy. I'm just saying there is discretion in how the court can handle this within the context of the plea deal. And all the facts that surrounded the original case -- and not just the plea deal itself -- might be considered when judging how to handle the case.
Are you fricking serious with this shite? I've told you 6 fricking times already. In the eyes of the court, the original charge is gone, disappeared, doesn't exist. Any judge that would bring that up would be removed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News