- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

un arms treaty obama will sign
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:27 am
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:27 am
Read an article now that 153 out of 156 nations will sign and it will go into effect June 3 but Obama needs 67 votes for it in the senate for it to pass.
My phone will not link you will have to Google. Sorry.
My phone will not link you will have to Google. Sorry.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:33 am to KingRanch
Thanks.
Anyone who votes yes needs their names to be known and voted out next term.
OB Viva La Resistance.
Anyone who votes yes needs their names to be known and voted out next term.
OB Viva La Resistance.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:04 pm to bulldog95
This thing is blown way out of proportion. First off, the 3 countries that are opposed to it are Syria, Iran, and North Korea. That's not a group I really want to be a part of. Second, there's a provision that guarantees each nation the power to control arms in their own nations by their own laws. Third, the UN has no power to make us do shite. The UN denied our resolution to go to war with Iraq. That worked just like they hoped right?
Stay focused on what legislation our lawmakers propose that will actually effect us. This UN treaty won't have an impact on anyone on his board. Period.
Stay focused on what legislation our lawmakers propose that will actually effect us. This UN treaty won't have an impact on anyone on his board. Period.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:13 pm to SW2SCLA
Its a backdoor to circumvent the 2nd admen. I don't trust Obama anything he can do to disarm the citizens ala Hitler he will do.
But true like you said it still has to pass congress for it to be approved for the US.
But true like you said it still has to pass congress for it to be approved for the US.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:15 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
Posted by SW2SCLA
What the frick dude???? Quit with THE facts
DRIVEMAN OUT
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:26 pm to death valley driver
So if it has no effect on anybody, what are we signing?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:39 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
It's aim is to track the international trade of weapons between nations. I'm skeptical it would even be successful at that, but it's not a terrible goal. By tracking the international flow of arms they hope to make it easier to find out who is selling arms to terrorist groups, militant sects in countries involved in civil war, organized crime groups, etc.
I've heard the argument about circumventing the 2nd amendment and I just don't buy it. I think it was just another talking point to rile everyone up during the scare. There are plenty of things for us to be concerned about without wasting time on this treaty.
I've heard the argument about circumventing the 2nd amendment and I just don't buy it. I think it was just another talking point to rile everyone up during the scare. There are plenty of things for us to be concerned about without wasting time on this treaty.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:45 pm to SW2SCLA
I'm not overly concerned about anything. Just curious and too lazy to look it up myself 
Posted on 5/18/13 at 12:50 pm to SW2SCLA
quote:
Second, there's a provision that guarantees each nation the power to control arms in their own nations by their own laws
That makes me feel better
Posted on 5/18/13 at 1:05 pm to ctiger69
A majority of senators have already made clear their opposition to ratifying the ATT. On March 23, 53 senators endorsed an amendment to the Senate Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2014, "establish[ing] a deficit neutral fund" to oppose United States entrance into the treaty. Additionally, Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kans.), along with 32 cosponsors, has put forth a concurrent resolution expressing the Senate's opposition to the ATT, as it "fails to expressly recognize the fundamental, individual right to keep and to bear arms and the individual right of personal self-defense... and thus risks infringing on freedoms protected by the Second Amendment."
Unfortunately, once a treaty has been signed, it normally remains available for the Senate to ratify in perpetuity, unless a later president withdraws from it. This means that American gun owners must remain vigilant in ensuring this treaty is never ratified. The NRA will continue to keep gun owners up to date on any movement toward ratification, and will work with our allies in the Senate to ensure the treaty remains unratified.
Unfortunately, once a treaty has been signed, it normally remains available for the Senate to ratify in perpetuity, unless a later president withdraws from it. This means that American gun owners must remain vigilant in ensuring this treaty is never ratified. The NRA will continue to keep gun owners up to date on any movement toward ratification, and will work with our allies in the Senate to ensure the treaty remains unratified.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 3:34 pm to bulldog95
OMFG, you mean the blue helmets are coming down tha bayou to take our guns away?!?! F-ing Obama has just ceded control to the UN over errything.
Quick, someone put up that gif with the two guys running back and forth saying ONOZ.
Quick, someone put up that gif with the two guys running back and forth saying ONOZ.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:45 pm to Mung
Not sure which amuses me more, the fact that Mung doesn't know how to post :omg: or the fact that Josey was posting it in the thread within a minute of Mung asking for it.

Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:35 pm to bulldog95
quote:
but Obama needs 67 votes for it in the senate for it to pass.
Well they couldn't even get 60 for background checks so this may not pass anyways.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 11:02 pm to bulldog95
The gun treaty is a bad idea...those that see otherwise are too blind to see what can become of this...
Popular
Back to top
5









