- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge imposes curfew for LSU running back Jeremy Hill
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:41 pm to Jwodie
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:41 pm to Jwodie
quote:
Everyone is assuming that Judge Jackson would deny any revocation motion merely because she added restrictions to Hill's probation
It really would make no sense at all to add restrictions if she even had the slightest feeling that later on, she may have to revoke the entire probation. IMO
"I'm going to add these restrictions but later I'm going to revoke your probation altogether."
Just thinking out loud, I know she didn't say that.
quote:
Lots of assuming going on...
No doubt. None of us were there to know the details so all people have are assumptions.
This post was edited on 5/7/13 at 11:43 pm
1
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:51 pm to la_birdman
quote:
It really would make no sense at all to add restrictions if she even had the slightest feeling that later on, she may have to revoke the entire probation. IMO
Well, sure it would. He's on probation as we know, then he's arrested and charged with simple battery. Judge Jackson on her own accord adds restrictions to the probation due to the arrest and misdemeanor charge until Hill is convicted or the charges are dismissed.
All I'm saying is the added restrictions to Hill's probation is not probative or determinative of the ultimate outcome, that being whether his probation is revoked. That remains to be seen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News