- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Reason for Keeping Eric Gordon
Posted on 5/6/13 at 10:23 pm to Cap Crunch
Posted on 5/6/13 at 10:23 pm to Cap Crunch
Cap Crunch
Playing in games isn't the only measure that goes into judging a veteran player. You'd have seen that by actually reading my reasoning.
I take his ability for face value and discount what people say he "could be" or "should be".
I mean I left a qualifier in the freaking reason title. Now I'm just beginning to think you're trolling.
quote:
He hasn't played a full season in his career since his rookie year
Playing in games isn't the only measure that goes into judging a veteran player. You'd have seen that by actually reading my reasoning.
quote:
I've yet to see him produce fully given his ability
I take his ability for face value and discount what people say he "could be" or "should be".
quote:
Just because we aren't paying anyone else money and have some to spend doesn't mean that we aren't completely overpaying for him
I mean I left a qualifier in the freaking reason title. Now I'm just beginning to think you're trolling.
1
Posted on 5/6/13 at 10:25 pm to Zoombop
Just to clarify, I'm not a Gordon backer, nor am I against him. I'm a Gordon qualifier. I understand reasons he should stay, and understand reasons he should go. For this argument, I decided to stand on a side that has a typically weaker defense.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News