Started By
Message

re: Cubs threaten to leave Wrigley if 'outfield signage' isnt approved

Posted on 5/1/13 at 11:15 am to
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 5/1/13 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Would this replace the ivy or is it above the wall? The ivy is a staple. Would be like Fenway tearing down the Green Monster and going with a normal fence.


Its above the wall. The disagreement is with the owners of the buildings behind the stadium that have people on their roof to watch the game. They signed a 20 year contract with the cubs to allow them to do this. The signs would block the views.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423787 posts
Posted on 5/1/13 at 11:19 am to
quote:

They signed a 20 year contract with the cubs to allow them to do this. The signs would block the views.

sounds like a settlement needs to be reached with these owners and the cubs need to just break that contract
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram