Started By
Message

re: Otto Porter or Trey Burke

Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:51 am to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9822 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 10:51 am to
It's not going to happen. Thomspon is a solid SG. Why would GSW trade for an injured/highly paid Gordon to replace a young, good Thompson? It doesn't make sense. The Warriors are going to have payroll issues, why would they add to them?
Posted by dafif5
Member since Nov 2012
629 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:07 am to
quote:

It's not going to happen. Thomspon is a solid SG. Why would GSW trade for an injured/highly paid Gordon to replace a young, good Thompson? It doesn't make sense. The Warriors are going to have payroll issues, why would they add to them?


Stop putting a damper on my McNamaraesque unrealistic prediction. Like McNamara has said, if we get Bledsoe, he will win DPOY.

Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61575 posts
Posted on 4/26/13 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Why would GSW trade for an injured/highly paid Gordon to replace a young, good Thompson?


Because the Warriors have too many shooters and not enough penetrators. On top of that they have serious money problems next season that will kill the depth that has made them a playoff team. The trade I proposed where we take both of their bad contracts let them keep things relatively intact.

The choice is keep the same roster but have to choose between keeping either Landry or Jack, or trade Thompson for Gordon and Barnes for Shabazz and keep both Landry and Jack. If they want to remain a playoff team and they aren't scared of Gordon's knee, that's a trade they strongly consider.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram