Started By
Message

re: Eric Bledsoe's Trade Value

Posted on 4/25/13 at 2:37 am to
Posted by PKTiger
NOLA
Member since Apr 2013
836 posts
Posted on 4/25/13 at 2:37 am to
I think one of the team's biggest problems this year was their depth, so I'm not a fan of giving up assets for Bledsoe.

Monty's system places a premium on being able to operate in the half-court, and I'm not sure he's ready for that. Bledsoe's at his best when he's in transition and he can use his athleticism to overmatch people. If you watch the Clippers bench when they slow down, Jamal Crawford handles the ball most of the time.

Bledsoe's better than GV, but he's not worth trading assets for then signing for more than we'd have to pay GV. Pairing Burke with GV would be the option I'd prefer.
This post was edited on 4/25/13 at 2:38 am
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 4/25/13 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Monty's system places a premium on being able to operate in the half-court


system or personnel?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram