- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Planned freshwater diversions will doom LA salt fishing
Posted on 3/27/13 at 11:43 am to eng08
Posted on 3/27/13 at 11:43 am to eng08
quote:
I will agree with you on one point Deege, diversions alone are worthless.
If the diversion has no sediment load then it will not work as intended/hoped.
If there is a sediment load then it will work beautifully.
As stated above the entire goal of the new diversions is to capture sediment and water in order to reduce the amount of dredging which is very expensive. It's a great example of the "work smarter not harder" philosophy.
Although it may have seemed otherwise in the previous thread, this is my sentiment. I'm not against the diversions, but am against ONLY the diversions. Caenarvon without sediment has failed to create any land.
Those who say it's because of storms need to consider storm surges could be worse BECAUSE of the loss of land. Isaac was a CAT 1, barely. It devastated St. Bernard and other areas with surge, and this didn't happen with similar storms in the not so distant past.
This post was edited on 3/27/13 at 11:51 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News