Started By
Message

re: What do you consider the "golden age" for television

Posted on 3/20/13 at 8:22 am to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 8:22 am to
I don't see how anyone can say anything but the 00s. There will always be bad TV, but niche programming has allowed some truly stellar shows on the air, and the medium has been able to attract far better talent than it could in the 70s, when it was seen as the ghetto for people who couldn't cut it in movies.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37413 posts
Posted on 3/20/13 at 8:24 am to
quote:

I don't see how anyone can say anything but the 00s. There will always be bad TV, but niche programming has allowed some truly stellar shows on the air, and the medium has been able to attract far better talent than it could in the 70s, when it was seen as the ghetto for people who couldn't cut it in movies.


But there was a lot of creativity in the 80s and 90s. Sure it wasn't bug budget, and none of it has aged particularly well, but they tried really hard to do different things.

I still think any list, best half hours and best hour longs, would be made up of mostly shows from that time span.

I'd argue though that the 2000s have been quite stellar so far.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 8/13/13 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

it was seen as the ghetto for people who couldn't cut it in movies.


This is what CBS is now.

Are you still somewhat relevant? Has Hollywood abandoned you? Well look no further, CBS has a primetime sitcom just for you centered around one joke.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram