Started By
Message

re: Ideal Pelicans First Offseason 2013

Posted on 3/19/13 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61586 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

why on earth would you do that?


Reason #1 is his bad rebounding. I fully expect a new starter at SF and the available SF upgrades will likely not rebound as well as Aminu. Reason #2 is he's terrible at defending the most run play in the league. He provides some decent offense, but between Anderson, Davis, and Smith the team isn't exactly lacking in points from the 4/5 spot. I wouldn't trade him willy nilly, but I'd think you could get a decent return for him.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40930 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34408 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Reason #1 is his bad rebounding. I fully expect a new starter at SF and the available SF upgrades will likely not rebound as well as Aminu.


I actually agree with this. However, if we can upgrade, Aminu and Lopez could be really useful off the bench. Are they going to be paid too much for that, though?

quote:

Reason #2 is he's terrible at defending the most run play in the league.


Playing him with Vasquez really exacerbates this flaw in both of their games. The end of the Lakers game exposed that lineup.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 5:25 pm to
This board would rather keep fricking Vasquez than Gordon. I've now seen it all
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 7:24 pm to
We will see next here how Vasquez can not help with us gets wins at PG
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram