Started By
Message

re: Why you shouldn't use a 22-250 on deer

Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:38 am to
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:38 am to
No you can't write a program called caliber killing effectiveness because you still don't understand that holes in deer mean lost potential energy and the fact that a lightweight fast bullet still is going to knock holes in them 99% of the time BECAUSE THEY'RE WHITETAIL DEER AND NOT CAPE frickING BUFFALO. So you lack the fundamentals here.

That said, I wouldn't WANT to use a 22-250 on deer. If I did though, I'd never take anything but a rock solid perfect shot with it. And I can promise you, they would turn off like flipping a switch.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 10:42 am to
There he is!

I track deer a whole lot for lots of different people who shoot lots of different stuff. There's a common theme with long tough tracking jobs: no exit hole.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48953 posts
Posted on 3/19/13 at 11:13 am to
quote:

you still don't understand that holes in deer mean lost potential energy
how does a bullet in motion have potential energy besides W*h? (which is in the perpendicular direction of what you're going for)
This post was edited on 3/19/13 at 11:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram