re: Games (that don't exist) you would kill to have? (Posted on 3/17/13 at 10:15 am to Mr Gardoki)
A racing/demolition derby game. I'd take the obnoxious smack-talking opponent from the 3DO version of "Need for Speed". I'd have 8 or 16 players, with multiplayer online capability. And I'd have the cars outfitted with various weapons to use against your opponents (like in Spy hunter when you dropped an oil slick or spewed a smoke cloud to make an enemy run off the road).
Second choice would be a baseball game where you could play in Forbes Field or Ebbets Field or the Polo Grounds, and you could play any season from the past. All of the actual games like that are text based simulations. I'd like to play them with arcade action and top of the line graphics.
re: Games (that don't exist) you would kill to have? (Posted on 3/17/13 at 11:35 am to GeauxWarTigers)
quote: The real Diablo 3.
quote: I just picked it up again after not playing since launch. It is better and pretty fun. It is still a grindfest (I think that is how ARPG looter games go), but it is actually a doable grindfest.
Before it was just beat your head into elite packs until you were broke.
I've been playing a little too, still get the occasional are you freaking kidding me elite pack but it's not like it was. Still not having much luck with drops though, but I am at least finding more than before.
Jumbeauxlaya LSU Fan Denham Member since Jan 2011 17253 posts
re: Games (that don't exist) you would kill to have? (Posted on 3/17/13 at 2:32 pm to TheSandman)
I saw an awesome concept game on reddit the other day...
Zombie-type serum is administered to men everywhere in an attempt to make them stronger better faster etc etc but unfortunately it has the long term effect of slowly (then faster and faster) diminishing brain functions so fast forward 6 months and all the men are zombies and you have 50's housewives running around trying to fight zombies. I thought it was hilarious.