Started By
Message

re: How good is Inglorious Basterds?

Posted on 2/26/13 at 10:43 pm to
Posted by Rittdog
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed
Member since Oct 2009
9955 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

. Pitt was terrible, and Fassbender's character annoyed the shite out of me.


Disagree there.

Pitt was solid. Although I must admit it seemed like he was playing in a different movie than everyone else until the very end

But that was probably what QT intended...Having the American soldiers represent War films of the 40s-60s.

Fassbender was tremendous imo. He makes that Tavern scene complete. Probably a top 5 scene in QT movie history.

However, the greatness of that scene is why I think Django Unchained is better. Django Unchained's "Dinner table scene" wasnt as good as IB's....but it was of greater importance. It directly involved central characters to the plot....which ultimately led to "Handshake Scene' which kicks the movie into high gear. I cared more about what was going to happen to Waltz, Foxx, Washington....then Fassbender, Stiglitz....only because..

QT didnt feature their characters enough in the movie. IB needed more Basterds in it imo. More Basterds and it probably is my favorite QT of all time.
This post was edited on 2/26/13 at 10:47 pm
Posted by Zed
Member since Feb 2010
8315 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Fassbender was tremendous imo.
I really didn't like how he played the character.

The dialogue was great as usual but Pitt especially didn't get it done for me. The casting for Django was exceptional, and I wouldn't replace anyone except maybe Kerry Washington.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram