Started By
Message

re: why did we trade Jack again?

Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:11 am to
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9828 posts
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:11 am to
quote:

the whole thing is ridiculous, because the situation worked out great for us. Vasquez has been more than what anyone had hoped for.


Why would have keeping Jack took away anything from Vasquez? Both would have been starting the majority of the season and played big minutes. Jack's minutes have gone to Rivers, Mason and Roberts.

quote:

Jack's a good player. Vasquez is better, especially all things considered


I don't know what you are considering. Cause he's younger, cheaper? They are a wash stats wise. We didn't gain anything by getting rid of Jack..
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Both would have been starting the majority of the season and played big minutes.


I know...you prefer Vasquez at the two

quote:

I don't know what you are considering. Cause he's younger, cheaper?


yep.

...Jack had a good season last year on a bad team. before that, he wasn't anything special.

It's good that Vasquez and Rivers are getting the minutes they're getting. Why would we want Jack taking time from them.
This post was edited on 2/23/13 at 2:47 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram