Started By
Message

re: why did we trade Jack again?

Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:56 am to
Posted by drake20
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13123 posts
Posted on 2/23/13 at 1:56 am to
quote:

I thought 100% after the year Jack had, and his favorable contract, that they would no doubt move him.

But, I didn't think they'd move him for literally nothing. Blah, blah freed up cap space to sign Lopez.

Jack was worth a pick in the 20s. Worst move Dell's made since he's been here - and that's a somewhat compliment to Dell


i don't disagree with you there....I thought moving on from him was a good move, but i was expecting more in return, too.

the whole thing is ridiculous, because the situation worked out great for us. Vasquez has been more than what anyone had hoped for.

Jack's a good player. Vasquez is better, especially all things considered. People overreacting to one bad shot. The ball slipped out of his hands.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9828 posts
Posted on 2/23/13 at 2:11 am to
quote:

the whole thing is ridiculous, because the situation worked out great for us. Vasquez has been more than what anyone had hoped for.


Why would have keeping Jack took away anything from Vasquez? Both would have been starting the majority of the season and played big minutes. Jack's minutes have gone to Rivers, Mason and Roberts.

quote:

Jack's a good player. Vasquez is better, especially all things considered


I don't know what you are considering. Cause he's younger, cheaper? They are a wash stats wise. We didn't gain anything by getting rid of Jack..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram