re: why did we trade Jack again?

quote:

---

4 years, 20 million isn't a bad deal for someone who would be arguably the best 6th man in the league

there's my point

---

it would be a great deal for a team looking to get over the hump....we're a lottery team in a rebuild.

4 years til he's 33...no thanks. It would be a good contract for a couple years and then hurt the team's ability to get better when they're ready to add the type of player we're talking about.

he would probably still be the starter if he was here....that would not be a good thing