Started By
Message

re: sigh....I love early Queen music.

Posted on 2/12/13 at 8:23 am to
Posted by dexy82
Madison, WI
Member since Sep 2004
1823 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 8:23 am to
quote:

As opposed to new Queen music?


well....yeah

70's Queen imo, was much edgier,raw,undecided.

mid eighties Queen became too polished for my taste

perhaps I should have titled it, early Queen Music
This post was edited on 2/12/13 at 8:24 am
Posted by SanDiegeauxSteve
The Greater San Diego Area
Member since Oct 2012
1751 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 10:48 am to
I bought Sheer Heart Attack the week it was released when I was in the Army. We then proceeded to wear the grooves out in the barracks on a daily basis.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 2/12/13 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

70's Queen imo, was much edgier,raw,undecided.

mid eighties Queen became too polished for my taste


I think they fooled you, brah. Listen to "Stone Cold Crazy" arguably their "rawest" and "edgiest" song - it seems edgier, raw, undecided, as you say - and it is arguably the first speed metal song ever recorded.

However, much like all of that stuff, if you listen closely - there's nothing raw or "unpolished" to it. That sound was built upon by some later acts, the NWOBHM, particularly cite glam acts and Queen (as well as the usual suspects, Led Zeppelin) as powerful influences, and that, in turn, led to the entire hair metal scene of the 1980s. Virtually everything audible on any Queen recording was deliberate - Mercury and May, particularly, were extremely meticuluous and did not leave much to chance, even in their early 20s. Deacon and Taylor are in the running for most underrated rhythm section in rock history.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram