- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I want a TRUE single action revolver
Posted on 2/1/13 at 3:08 pm to upgrade
Posted on 2/1/13 at 3:08 pm to upgrade
I really can't fathom why the OP would not want the transfer bar. I don't see any disadvantage to having one i wouldn't think it would operate any differently and only serve to keep the owner safer. I inherited a new pattern stainless steel ruger black hawk 357 from my grand father but haven't shot it yet.
Posted on 2/1/13 at 3:20 pm to bayoudude
quote:
I really can't fathom why the OP would not want the transfer bar
I have a new model Single Six with transfer bar.
My dad has the old model Single Six without.
When you cock the hammer on his gun you hear and feel 4 or 5 clicks as you bring it to full cock.
It sounds kinda cool, almost like a movie gun, but I rather have my transfer bar and keep it fully loaded.
Growing up shooting his Single Six was the reason I had to get one for myself.
Ruger states in the owners manual of my Single Six (yes I'm that kind of guy) that they will convert any of their pre-transfer bar guns to New models for free. I would not go that far though.
Posted on 2/1/13 at 3:46 pm to bayoudude
Many people prefer the old Ruger action without the transfer bar for various reasons. Some like the way the action feels when the hammer is cocked, others like the nostalgia. Some like the fact that you have to be more careful and in tune with the gun so as to handle it safely.
Before Ruger added the indexing pawl to the newest guns the chambers on the New Model guns wouldn't readily line up with the loading gate, which was annoying. Even with that, they don't load on half-cock hammer position which some traditionalists don't like. Also, the triggers on the New Model Rugers generally aren't as good.
The safety notches on hammers of Old Model Rugers and Colts and the sears on the triggers of those same guns simply aren't strong enough to be used for safe carry with six rounds (a strong blow will break them off and probably cause a discharge). Carrying the gun with the hammer down on a live round means that the firing pin is resting directly on the primer, a recipe for disaster if the hammer is bumped.
I can't say this enought, always carry these guns with 5 rounds and an empty chamber under the hammer.
Before Ruger added the indexing pawl to the newest guns the chambers on the New Model guns wouldn't readily line up with the loading gate, which was annoying. Even with that, they don't load on half-cock hammer position which some traditionalists don't like. Also, the triggers on the New Model Rugers generally aren't as good.
The safety notches on hammers of Old Model Rugers and Colts and the sears on the triggers of those same guns simply aren't strong enough to be used for safe carry with six rounds (a strong blow will break them off and probably cause a discharge). Carrying the gun with the hammer down on a live round means that the firing pin is resting directly on the primer, a recipe for disaster if the hammer is bumped.
I can't say this enought, always carry these guns with 5 rounds and an empty chamber under the hammer.
This post was edited on 2/1/13 at 4:52 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News