Started By
Message

re: Louisiana High School Football will split Public/Private. **Edited with Yes/No**

Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by CourseyCorridor
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since May 2012
1996 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:27 pm to
Remember how you said public schools can't do the things that private schools do with their player development systems? As this story illustrates, that's utter nonsense:

LINK

The issue is, a lot of public schools don't want to invest (and not necessarily monetarily) in what it takes to be good at something. They want mediocre effort to be rewarded in the same way excellence is rewarded.

It's not just football or athletics, it's everything a lot of our public schools do. The emphasis is doing enough to meet a minimal standard, as opposed to thriving to be the best.

But at schools that "get it," public or private, excellence is achieved. It just so happens that, in a lot of cases, people who are interested in achieving excellence has found they need to achieve it at a private school because the local public schools systemically don't allow it to happen.

In terms of football, you have to have enough coaches. You have to have multiple sub-varsity teams that are getting quality reps at practice and quality game time. You have to have more than one or two coaches at the middle schools and the middle schoolers need to be learning the game in a way where it's not being taught at a remedial level during freshman football. You have to have facilities.

Etc., etc.

And the public schools are perfectly capable of having all this. Many don't and instead they blame the private schools for having it.

The problem is, Winnfield can do all this but still not win because EBR schools can't get their act together, so anybody in BR who has ambition for their kids' athletic future will probably send their kids to private school, most of which play in 1A, 2A or 3A against mostly small town, public schools.

That's the only part that isn't fair in this whole deal.





Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6604 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Remember how you said public schools can't do the things that private schools do with their player development systems? As this story illustrates, that's utter nonsense:

LINK

The issue is, a lot of public schools don't want to invest (and not necessarily monetarily) in what it takes to be good at something. They want mediocre effort to be rewarded in the same way excellence is rewarded.

It's not just football or athletics, it's everything a lot of our public schools do. The emphasis is doing enough to meet a minimal standard, as opposed to thriving to be the best.

But at schools that "get it," public or private, excellence is achieved. It just so happens that, in a lot of cases, people who are interested in achieving excellence has found they need to achieve it at a private school because the local public schools systemically don't allow it to happen.

In terms of football, you have to have enough coaches. You have to have multiple sub-varsity teams that are getting quality reps at practice and quality game time. You have to have more than one or two coaches at the middle schools and the middle schoolers need to be learning the game in a way where it's not being taught at a remedial level during freshman football. You have to have facilities.

Etc., etc.

And the public schools are perfectly capable of having all this. Many don't and instead they blame the private schools for having it.

The problem is, Winnfield can do all this but still not win because EBR schools can't get their act together, so anybody in BR who has ambition for their kids' athletic future will probably send their kids to private school, most of which play in 1A, 2A or 3A against mostly small town, public schools.

That's the only part that isn't fair in this whole deal.




Lazy public school coaches.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

The issue is, a lot of public schools don't want to invest (and not necessarily monetarily) in what it takes to be good at something. They want mediocre effort to be rewarded in the same way excellence is rewarded.

Sorry, but the article does not support your fantasy. Lets look at the team mentioned in the article:

Hahnville (public) hasnt been to a final in 17 years - voted to split

St Charles Catholic (private) State champ last year - Voted No

Destrehan (public) hasnt been to a finals in 4 years - voted to split

St. James (public) hasnt been to a finals in 5 years - voted to split

West St John (public) finals last year - voted to split

John Curtis (private) State champs or finals almost every year for 20 years - voted No


The publics know that even the years that you get a once in a lifetime team, they have to go up against kids that have been playing together for 7/8 years. If LSU could have its athletes on campus for 8 years, they would be a dynasty


Since 2000 a select school has been in the finals:
1A -- 9 of 12 years, with 3 years all select teams
2A -- 9 of 12 years, with 5 years all select
3A -- 11 of 12 years, with 4 years all select
4A -- 11 of 12 years, with 4 years all select
5A -- 7 of 12 years, no all select years

And its not like these are all dynasty programs, only John Curtis and Evangel show up every year. There have been 16 other selects that have showed up in the finals. Thats 23% of the select schools playing in 64% of the football finals.

It has little to do with long term investment/coaching when 16 of the 18 select programs rarely repeat their success. Its about recruiting a stacked team, then falling back to where you were
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram