- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Greivis Vasquez should get more recognition
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:42 pm to 42
Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:42 pm to 42
quote:
He is one of the only assets that we could / would part with to get back some value.
I don't see how they can possibly trade him without getting a PG back. Next season's unrestricted FA's are CP3, then a big drop to maybe one or two players on Vasquez's level (Calderon, MAYBE Jack) and a bunch that aren't as good as Vasquez is. If we miss out on one of those guys, we're in a pretty bad spot for a season where we want to make a leap.
2
Posted on 1/21/13 at 10:03 pm to THRILLHO
Him in the backcourt, Smith in the frontcourt.
I'd say you could part with Lopez, but maybe Monty/Dell do not.
It would have to be a trade where more pieces were moved for a number of reasons, one of which is your point, and the other is that his salary is so low it's just impossible to upgrade and match salaries when limiting to players other teams would part with.
They could, for instance, trade GV as part of an sign-and-trade for Jennings, which would fit with what you are talking about. There may need to be more depending on the Bucks' plans and limits on spending (self-imposed). They could trade GV and Aminu and stuff for a SF and stuff and forego the rest of the season.
Moving Smith (if he's not damaged) is easier for a few reasons.
I'd say you could part with Lopez, but maybe Monty/Dell do not.
It would have to be a trade where more pieces were moved for a number of reasons, one of which is your point, and the other is that his salary is so low it's just impossible to upgrade and match salaries when limiting to players other teams would part with.
They could, for instance, trade GV as part of an sign-and-trade for Jennings, which would fit with what you are talking about. There may need to be more depending on the Bucks' plans and limits on spending (self-imposed). They could trade GV and Aminu and stuff for a SF and stuff and forego the rest of the season.
Moving Smith (if he's not damaged) is easier for a few reasons.
Posted on 1/21/13 at 10:13 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
players on Vasquez's level (Calderon, MAYBE Jack
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News