Started By
Message

re: Paging Daylower---duck hunting question

Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:50 am to
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19713 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the GW that I took more than I should have on any given day?



No, because you would be hypothetically charged with over the possession limit, not daily.

quote:

That is not to say I don't understand the law as written, I just dont understand why it is written that way. The intent of the law should be to conserve a resource while promoting the sport and this clearly does not hit that mark.


Neither do I man, but what else is new with lawmakers, esp the Feds.

quote:

What if I dontated the duck to a friend who is down and out? He does not hunt, he can not buy a license, he and his family are broke and hungry. According to the law he is above the possession limit.


Yeah, technically, and if they arent tagged, then there's a tagging violation as well.

ALL of this is extremely hypothetical though, and unless you are the scum of the earth, there is 0 chance of this happening to you.
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 1/22/13 at 10:55 am to
I hunt ethically enough and feel I am far enough removed from teh scum of the earth that I hunt with GW frequently and would be glad to hunt with you. Thanks for entertaining my questions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram