Statute has nothing to do with 2009 and 2010 since he never testified about doping in those years. The last time he was under oath was back in 2005. If he was lying about 2009 and 2010, his teammates who've already testified against him would know about it. One explanantion is that perhaps the peleton was relatively clean in 2009 and 2010.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CXSteve

Member since Oct 2012

857 posts

Posted on 1/18/13 at 7:25 am to trackfan

quote:
quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He cannnot admit doping in those years because Statute not up & could lead to more legal issues.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statute has nothing to do with 2009 and 2010 since he never testified about doping in those years. The last time he was under oath was back in 2005. If he was lying about 2009 and 2010, his teammates who've already testified against him would know about it. One explanantion is that perhaps the peleton was relatively clean in 2009 and 2010.

:

Read on cycling site, if he doesn't admit to 09/10 & gets lifetime ban lowered to 8 years. The 8 year could be backdated to 2005 & be able to do his Triathlon-ing.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by danfraz

San Antonio TX

Member since Apr 2008

24550 posts

Posted on 1/18/13 at 7:27 am to trackfan

said over and over he was clean in 09/10 when he finished 3rd and 23rd

also said that was the reason for all this. If he hadn't come back he might have gotten away with it

while he was open about his personality and "bullying", he was also clearly trying to save face and would spin anything Oprah brought up into this "I know how bad I was" yet still hasn't answered WHY he fought the truth for 15 years

1 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board