Started By
Message

re: Kiper's First Mock has us taking Hankins

Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:40 am to
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24718 posts
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Teams had the most success running to the outside instead of up the middle


I'm not so sure of your statement's validity, but yes there were many big runs ripped off on the edge, especially on the left side (ughem! Will Smith!). I do recall though runs up the middle that gashed us as well, and it was quite consistent that we were a complete mess on the line whether it be right middle or left.

Kiper isn't wrong in saying we need a DT. We do! The question remains if this guy is the one we need. I don't like reading him state "Hankins ran a little hot and cold, and the tape doesn't show a player who will penetrate and use quickness to beat interior blockers." Well hell, what's the point of a DT if he can't beat the blockers?!?!?! We aren't looking for a NT to take on double teams in a 3-4; we need DT's that can shed blocks as well as maintain position against them.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33766 posts
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:45 am to
I guess I'm thinking more about the Panther games in particular then. That read option they ran absolutely killed us. Those were toughest games to watch in my opinion. They ran all over us.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72061 posts
Posted on 1/16/13 at 11:50 am to
The question is, which on the guys in Kiper's mock would you want if not Hankins?

Sam Montgomery?
Ansah?


Trade down in the 1st and take Minter? John Jenkins? Margus Hunt?

Surprise the world and take another TE to go with Graham? Or maybe a WR? Our FO has done weirder things in the draft.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram