Started By
Message

re: Next: Top 200 MWADS March 2013

Posted on 2/26/13 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34488 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 5:09 pm to
Definitely.

Since its up for debate, I say separate the movies. It will make totaling the list harder but it will also show how good a single movie is viewed vs the others in the series/trilogy. Matrix might make the list as a top 25 movie but 2 and 3 wont even be considered, I wouldnt think. It makes it much easier to rank a trilogy higher when they are together than they are separated. Ex: Maybe somebody likes Casablanca better than Fellowship of the Rings, but likes the trilogy better. It gives LOTR an advantage just because its a trilogy. I dont know if thats a bad thing or good thing though.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109101 posts
Posted on 2/26/13 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

It gives LOTR an advantage just because its a trilogy. I dont know if thats a bad thing or good thing though.


I seriously doubt that. The trilogy improves as a single piece of work, as I'm sure the Hobbit will as well. I'd say make LOTR and Kill Bill the only exceptions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram