Started By
Message

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?

Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:03 am to
Posted by AustinKnight
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
5842 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:03 am to
u guys have no vision and have never seen talent and prob a nega tiger because the best is in the past.

U motherfrickers that cant get over loses and move on to the fact we are a Top 5 program and will be until recruits read ur frickin craziness need to SMD!
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28277 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:06 am to
quote:


u guys have no vision and have never seen talent and prob a nega tiger because the best is in the past.

U motherfrickers that cant get over loses and move on to the fact we are a Top 5 program and will be until recruits read ur frickin craziness need to SMD!



English?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76568 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 5:07 pm to
Calm down, Jeremy. We do think you're good. And we know its important that the Rant appreciates your talent. We just think you're still young and you probably never actually watched Faulk or Cecil or Alley or Toefield or D. Davis.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram