Started By
Message

re: The administration's plan on Red Snapper

Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:23 pm to
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29224 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 4:23 pm to
Jason, I usually respect your opinion on most things, but when you suggest that the commercial fishing lobby doesn't outspend and outmaneuver the recreational lobbyists on the regular, you're pulling someone's leg.

There are also well documented, public statements made by commercial fishermen in New England stating that they would pull their trawls until the very last ground fish was removed from their fishing areas, sustainability be damned. And it pretty much worked that way. And pretty much got there with swordfish, and with bluefin tuna.
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6398 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Jason, I usually respect your opinion on most things, but when you suggest that the commercial fishing lobby doesn't outspend and outmaneuver the recreational lobbyists on the regular, you're pulling someone's leg.


When it comes to the south it's true. I really can't comment on the northeast as I don't know much about that area's commercial industry. Maybe they are more organized, but the commercial lobbying groups are almost a joke in the south. I know because my brother and dad were president (different orginazations) on some of the boards at one time. The fisherman used to argue with each other and nobody wanted to put up money to fight.

Gulf fish lobbying groups are pretty much non-existent. Shrimp lobbying groups have a little more power with oysters probably being the strongest in the seafood industy I would guess.
This post was edited on 1/11/13 at 5:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram