Started By
Message

re: The administration's plan on Red Snapper

Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:12 pm to
i think you are correct, but do not think that is a bad thing. I would wager the recs have a greater economic impact when you look at what they spend vs. the impact the commercials had with the same resource.
Posted by JasonL79
Member since Jan 2010
6398 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

would wager the recs have a greater economic impact when you look at what they spend vs. the impact the commercials had with the same resource.


Oh I can agree with that. There is more money in the recreational industry no doubt. But there still should be some balance between the two. Like I said, people who don't fish should still be able to buy fish and eat it at restaurants.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram