- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The administration's plan on Red Snapper
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:12 pm to JasonL79
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:12 pm to JasonL79
i think you are correct, but do not think that is a bad thing. I would wager the recs have a greater economic impact when you look at what they spend vs. the impact the commercials had with the same resource.
Posted on 1/11/13 at 5:04 pm to Mung
quote:
would wager the recs have a greater economic impact when you look at what they spend vs. the impact the commercials had with the same resource.
Oh I can agree with that. There is more money in the recreational industry no doubt. But there still should be some balance between the two. Like I said, people who don't fish should still be able to buy fish and eat it at restaurants.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News