- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:08 am to theunknownknight
quote:Ah, so not making FBS Top 10 MoV is sucking? LSU wasn't at the bottom just because it didn't make Top 10 those 4 years.
We sucked at MoV in 4 out of Miles 8 seasons...which proves the exact opposite of your assertion. The difference: 4 of the bad seasons came in the last 5 years.
Your "case" blows.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:12 am to Mayhawman
quote:
Ah, so not making FBS Top 10 MoV is sucking? LSU wasn't at the bottom just because it didn't make Top 10 those 4 years.
How'd they compare to the rest of the SEC, particular the good half in MoV in the last 5 seasons?
You see, the SEC is what matters. If we aren't good enough here from now on out, nothing else matters.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:13 am to Mayhawman
quote:well, what place were they in?
LSU wasn't at the bottom just because it didn't make Top 10 those 4 year
do you know?
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:23 am to afatgreekcat
quote:
I sincerely hope this is not a serious statement.
In 2010 JJ completed 56% of his passes, had 7 TDs, 10 ints, and a rating of 115.
In 2011 JJ completed 61%, had 6 TDs, 3 ints, and a rating of 139.
Both got better and you do have to be blind or bias not to see it.
They both still had major flaws in their QB ability as I have pointed out, but they improved.
I dont know why it's so hard for some of our negatigers to admit.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:30 am to LSU Groupee
quote:
Both got better and you do have to be blind or bias not to see it
Bad is bad. Not much else to it.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:44 am to CptBengal
quote:Prove your own point, as I proved mine.
well, what place were they in?
do you know?
All you need to do is show Miles didn't fail miserably at keeping the score close 4/8 years of his LSU tenure.
Good luck.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:48 am to League Champs
Miles always plays down to the competition! Never goes for stile points. Some times gets to close for me like the Aub. game this year. 
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:48 am to Mayhawman
quote:I'm asking you to prove your point. You haven't.
Prove your own point, as I proved mine.
In fact the data presents THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF YOUR OP.
You are currently booming yourself, made some outrageous claim I asked you to back up. You can't because the data doesn't agree with your absurd contention.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:50 am to Mayhawman
To all you sunshine pumpers, why do most sports analysis not think much of Miles coaching in games? Just heard Barnhart say he was disappointed in "watching Miles mismanage the Clemson game for the hundredth time". 
Posted on 1/7/13 at 11:54 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Because he doesn't want to
Awww, leave him alone he's working. So what's the going rate per post? Hope you guys get a raise next year.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 12:19 pm to CptBengal
quote:How does LSU attaining FBS Top 10 in MoV 4/8 years not contradict a philosophy of keeping games close?
In fact the data presents THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF YOUR OP.
quote:I made no claim nor "boom", but did quote facts if you bother to check link.
You are currently booming yourself, made some outrageous claim I asked you to back up.
quote:Wow. Your absurd contention must be LSU would have to finish FBS Top 10 MoV 8/8 years to dispel the fallacy of liking to keep games close.
You can't because the data doesn't agree with your absurd contention.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 12:22 pm to Mayhawman
Les miles is a great bowl coach as well if you give him a month to prepare.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 12:23 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
How does LSU attaining FBS Top 10 in MoV 4/8 years not contradict a philosophy of keeping games close?
do you know what a "trend" is? Do you understand temporal relationships?
quote:
Your absurd contention must be LSU would have to finish FBS Top 10 MoV 8/8 years to dispel the fallacy of liking to keep games close.
that wasn't my contention. Did you have similar difficulty when reading the article in the OP? Is that why you have no idea it refutes your point?
Posted on 1/7/13 at 1:02 pm to CptBengal
quote:A "trend" that works only with removing the 2011 season? Very temporal.
do you know what a "trend" is?
quote:The site shows LSU Top 10 FBS MoV 4/8 years (quite a feat) which refutes any staff philosophy of trying to keep games close.
Did you have similar difficulty when reading the article in the OP? I
I'm not sure what you get out of that link, but I'm sure it's negative towards LSU and the sky is falling.
So where is your evidence LSU staff has a philosophy of trying to keep games close?
Got a link or just more drivel?
Posted on 1/7/13 at 1:43 pm to afatgreekcat
quote:
Bad is bad. Not much else to it.
We were not discussing if both QBs were bad. We were talking about improvement from 2010 to 2011.
I pointed out the improvement you are too blind or bias to see and you jumped to another topic.
Negatigers dont like being proven wrong. I would think you guys would be use to it by now.
Posted on 1/7/13 at 1:49 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
A "trend" that works only with removing the 2011 season? Very temporal.
As opposed to relying on the weight of the first three seasons while ignoring the weight of the last FIVE to show a modern trend?
Wow
This post was edited on 1/7/13 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 1/7/13 at 1:55 pm to theunknownknight
wow that was eye opening. i thought our offense sucked and needed fixing but apparently its terrific! hooray for us!
Posted on 1/7/13 at 2:43 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
As opposed to relying on the weight of the first three seasons while ignoring the weight of the last FIVE to show a modern trend?
Trends are current results and don't contain 5 yr periods. Maybe 2 yrs or 3 tops.
Most reasonable people judge a program on its whole or last 2 to 3 yrs. When you start with the cherry picking you start losing creditability. imo
It's really kinda amusing that in 08, 09, and beginning of 2010 the little faith guys didn't want to talk 5 yrs, but only the current 2 &1/2 yr trend.
Now, the little faith guys want to talk 5 yrs and not 2 & 1/2. Go figure......
Kinda like at one time all rage here was the 8-8 SEC LSU 2 yr record. Now that its a 2 yr SEC record of 15-2, that's hardly ever even mentioned.
Go figure........
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News