Started By
Message

re: Lance Armstrong May Come Clean about Being Dirty

Posted on 1/5/13 at 9:45 am to
Posted by snake23
NOLA/BR
Member since Dec 2011
4438 posts
Posted on 1/5/13 at 9:45 am to
quote:

What evidence is there that he wasn't doping while racing tris?

Because he was winning tris up until a few months ago. In fact, his victory came while his doping investigation was ongoing. I think it's safe to assume that a 41 year old Lance, with nothing really to gain from winning, wasn't doping while an investigation into his past doping use was ongoing.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35429 posts
Posted on 1/5/13 at 9:51 am to
I doubt he was doping for races like Superfrog after all the USADA stuff went down, but when he was shooting for Kona and was seriously training I wouldn't be surprised if he was.

Before he got back into triathlon, his first emails were to Michele Ferrari's son
This post was edited on 1/5/13 at 9:57 am
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
4918 posts
Posted on 1/5/13 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Because he was winning tris up until a few months ago. In fact, his victory came while his doping investigation was ongoing. I think it's safe to assume that a 41 year old Lance, with nothing really to gain from winning, wasn't doping while an investigation into his past doping use was ongoing.


Why is that safe to assume? The guy is a pathological liar and there is so much dope on the market that is impossible to test for.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram