- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Doing LES with more.....
Posted on 1/4/13 at 2:03 am to CptBengal
Posted on 1/4/13 at 2:03 am to CptBengal
quote:
Btw. I noticed you avoided the leverage question. Good choice as you would have gotten beat up pretty hard for not even recognizing the underlying pattern in the data.
There is no reason to address it. You ran your tests and got your conclusions, I just think you took variables that are skewed away from LSU and it makes the picture look worse than it is.
I am not a Miles defender, I am a LSU defender and fancy chart crap like this is pointless unless it gives the person reading it meaningful information. To say Miles is bad at developing talent because our offensive yardage is low compared to the rest of the FBS doesn't make that arguement. I am interested in seeing how it really does measure up, but I don't think there is a realistic way to do it without a tremendous amount of effort manipulating data to do it and in the end, what will be the conclusion? That our offense has underperformed? We don't need statistics to see that.
quote:
A good coach/recruiter gets talent for both sides of the ball
100% agree, but our defensive production isn't in the comparison and yet they are in the recruiting rank.
quote:
lmao. The miles defender argument if choice....answer me how many teams had ten win seasons this year. Then tell me how many of them are psid as much as miles.
Saban, Meyer, Stoops, Brown are all paid higher than Miles. If aTm beats OU, then Miles will have done better than half of the group and we had a much tougher schedule than all of them.
quote:
Good choice as you would have gotten beat up pretty hard for not even recognizing the underlying pattern in the data.
LOL. A statistics guy talking shite about virtually "beating me up pretty hard".........made my night. Happy data mining, mate.
2
Posted on 1/4/13 at 2:08 am to stho381
quote:
Saban, Meyer, Stoops, Brown are all paid higher than Miles. If aTm beats OU, then Miles will have done better than half of the group and we had a much tougher schedule than all of them.
Oklahoma is 10-2. If Oklahoma loses to A&M they will end up at 10-3, the same record as us. And they will have lost their bowl game, though to a better team than we did. I wouldn't call that worse. I'd call that equal. Not so sure about the "tough schedule" part either, given that we beat 2 good teams and a lot of shitty teams.
Posted on 1/4/13 at 8:15 am to stho381
quote:
I just think you took variables that are skewed away from LSU
Nope. I took two variablesof interest and related them temporally.
You dont like the results because it casts a negstive light on miles as a coach. It actually shows tha despite miles awful coaching, LSU continues to get good recruits.
Your base analysis belies your claims of being pro LSU rather than a miles fan.
Btw, yhe beat up pretty hard relates to the intellectual discussion you are currently flsiling at...as evidenced by your fsilure t o understsand the context where it was used. That's pretty pathetic, especially for someone will came in the thread to tell me how my analysis was wrong. Are you delusional, or maybe youre les.... that's soething a msn who should be managing s trucking depot would miss.
A pro lsu fan wants the best for lsu. This data shows we dont have the best.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News