- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The problem with "a win is a win"
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:16 pm to EarthwormJim
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:16 pm to EarthwormJim
Yesterday the discussion on Sports Today, Hannegriff, Ott, and Ponamsky, was that LSU has not recruited well at the receiver position for the last 4 years. The Patterson stud that went to Tennessee chose them over LSU.
If you were a stud receiver, would you choose LSU where the passing route tree consists of bubble screens, slants, and the occasional sluggo (slant and go)?
If you were a stud receiver, would you choose LSU where the passing route tree consists of bubble screens, slants, and the occasional sluggo (slant and go)?
This post was edited on 1/3/13 at 2:19 pm
1
Posted on 1/3/13 at 2:29 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Yesterday the discussion on Sports Today, Hannegriff, Ott, and Ponamsky, was that LSU has not recruited well at the receiver position for the last 4 years. The Patterson stud that went to Tennessee chose them over LSU.
Possibly, I think Landry and OBJ have potential to be studs if we can get the offense as a whole back on track. This year we were pretty young at the position, and sure that has to do with missing out on studs like Mike Davis, Patterson, etc...
I'm not sure if I will concede that we missed out on those guys simply because of the offense. Over the last 4 years we brought in 2 five stars, 6 four stars, and 4 three stars.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News