- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO
Posted on 12/31/12 at 10:32 am to Lago Tiger
Posted on 12/31/12 at 10:32 am to Lago Tiger
Try to follow my logic:
-Running backs (besides AP) are not that valuable.
-You want to trade our starting running back. Which means you think he's expendable and we can get some one else to easily replace him.
-What makes you think anyone else would want a running back like that?
-What would you expect to get in return?
-Not a defensive playmaker. Those are hard to find. RBs are a dime a dozen and have short NFL shelf lives.
So to answer your question. NO
-Running backs (besides AP) are not that valuable.
-You want to trade our starting running back. Which means you think he's expendable and we can get some one else to easily replace him.
-What makes you think anyone else would want a running back like that?
-What would you expect to get in return?
-Not a defensive playmaker. Those are hard to find. RBs are a dime a dozen and have short NFL shelf lives.
So to answer your question. NO
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News