Started By
Message

re: How long until the Redskins are forced to change their name?

Posted on 12/30/12 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120386 posts
Posted on 12/30/12 at 10:59 pm to
Redskin is way more racist than indian.

Though the indians logo may be more racist
Posted by wizziko
New Jersey Nets Fan
Member since Jan 2006
35881 posts
Posted on 12/30/12 at 11:04 pm to
If they make the Super Bowl, it will be a shitshow
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31642 posts
Posted on 12/30/12 at 11:04 pm to
May be? It is the equivalent of a lawn jockey.
Posted by alabamabuckeye
Member since Jun 2010
22206 posts
Posted on 12/30/12 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Redskin is way more racist than indian.

Though the indians logo may be more racist


True.

I guess Redskins would be first, followed closely by the Indians.
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142416 posts
Posted on 12/30/12 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Redskin is way more racist than indian


why?

their mascot has red skin
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 12/31/12 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Redskin is way more racist than indian.

Though the indians logo may be more racist


To be fair, Redskin is a more accurate description than Indian. Think why they are called Indians.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram