Started By
Message

re: If 'Bama is a dynasty then LSU is a mini-dynasty

Posted on 12/26/12 at 7:03 pm to
Posted by jrevonte
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
1801 posts
Posted on 12/26/12 at 7:03 pm to
IMO if it happened in the 20th century it is no longer relevant! this is the 21st century and you are too ready to give up our position as the best in the west...Look at these facts

in the New Millennium



LSU has two NC Tigers (2) New Millennium NC

LSU has 5 Conference Championships Tigers (5) Division Championships

Bama Has Two NC Bama's 2 New Millennium NC

Bama Has 3 Conference Championships Bama's (3) Fricking New millenium Conference Championships

I think we qualify as a fricking Major Dynasty!!! and a Fricking Powerhouse!!!
This post was edited on 12/26/12 at 7:20 pm
Posted by DownSouthCrawfish
Simcoe Strip - He/Him/Helicopter
Member since Oct 2011
36445 posts
Posted on 12/26/12 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Powerhouse!
:kige:


quote:

Major Dynasty!!
lol no
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 7:28 am to
quote:

I think we qualify as a fricking Major Dynasty!!! and a Fricking Powerhouse!!!


This is not correct sorry.

Not winning a NC going on 6 years now does NOT make you a "MAJOR" dynasty.

Even at this point Bama is not a dynasty, they are simply on a incredible 3 to 4 year run.

Getting your arse handed to you in the BCSNC game after a almost 6 years of not making the game does not make you a "powerhouse". Ohio State made a couple of BCSNC games in just a few short years of each other so does that make them a powerhouse?

Staying ranked in the top 10 makes you a soild football team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram