re: If 'Bama is a dynasty then LSU is a mini-dynasty

There is no such thing in a sport that does not define their champion on the field but instead by an opinion based corrupt polling system. There can be no dynasty with a bcs system where some teams have the unfair advantage of not playing Florida, Georgia, or USCe on an annual basis. If the schedules aren't fair, a playoff is needed and its blatantly obvious the schedules aren't fair. Next season lsu plays UGA and Florida. Who does bama play? Neither or USCe, essentially walking into the SECt game again. frick the word dynasty until there is a more efficient and fair system in place.

Also, please save any comment regarding dynasty combined with last years MNC for bama. The fact lsu had to play bama again last year was a crock of horseshite and everyone knows it. Using this logic, Florida should be playing ND since they have 5 wins over bcs top 12 compared to bamas 1.

The bottom line is since 2001 titles that are actually played out on the field, lsu has 4 SEC titles to bamas 2 and 2-2 since Saban has been at bama so:

IF bama = dynasty, THEN LSU = dynasty