Started By
Message

re: Saw the Jack Reacher movie this afternoon.

Posted on 12/21/12 at 10:13 pm to
Posted by VolsMissthe90s
Member since Oct 2012
3038 posts
Posted on 12/21/12 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

86% rating on Rotten Tomatoes

"The film has received mixed to positive reviews from critics, as it has a 61% positive rating on the film-critics aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, based on 107 reviews"

quote:

Just cause he jumps on Oprah's couch, might be gay, or believes in Xenu

This has nothing to do with it but whatever floats your boat.
This post was edited on 12/21/12 at 10:15 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61391 posts
Posted on 12/22/12 at 12:26 am to
quote:

"The film has received mixed to positive reviews from critics, as it has a 61% positive rating on the film-critics aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, based on 107 reviews"
This is the link I got from the theater's website. it has it at 86%, but with far less reviews.

At any rate, it's a very good movie. The audience I saw it with applauded at the end of the movie.

LINK


ETA: And for fans of the books, Crusie is good in the role of Jack Reacher. You just have to let go of your image of Reacher from the books and go with the flow.
This post was edited on 12/22/12 at 12:28 am
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26175 posts
Posted on 12/22/12 at 7:44 am to
quote:

"The film has received mixed to positive reviews from critics, as it has a 61% positive rating on the film-critics aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, based on 107 reviews"


If you judge a movie before you see it based on what critics think you need to reevaluate. Audience meter should be the most important barometer to the average moviegoer. Critics are pretentious as shite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram