Started By
Message

re: Suppressed Study: Three Myths about Copyright Law and Where to Start to Fix it

Posted on 12/19/12 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 12/19/12 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

intellectual property is a commodity


I disagree, but then that gets into AnCap philosophy and why I don't believe that intellectual property actually exists, and there's no need for that in this thread.

quote:

i think making it harder to receive protection and limiting the time periods would do some good to clean the system up




quote:

i have no problem rewarding people for their creativity


Neither do I. From a pragmatic standpoint, I would be just fine with copyright law as originally enacted in the USA (14 years initial, option for 14 year renewal).

But I also have no problem violating and advocating the violation of the asinine laws that are in place now, even to the point of extremism. Because that's the only way things will change.




But really, I think going forward in the future, we're going to see a world where the concept of intellectual property is just not realistic. Technology will simply make it infeasible. JMO.




Posted by Kubricked
Member since Nov 2012
302 posts
Posted on 12/19/12 at 9:55 pm to
The U. S. Constitution allows for copyrights to exist to advance the arts. How so? Artists are compensated for their work.

Netflix spends hundreds of millions of dollars to secure the legal right to distribute content. TV networks do as well.

The legal owner of the song, film, book, etc is paid. Not much usually but something. That's why people put out effort and create and can afford to continue to create in the future.

The laws have extended. Sony Bono was in Congress and was a friend to the industry (and his heirs) and helped to extend it.

Walt Disney faces major issues. Pooh and Micky Mouse may both be public domain soon, costing that company hundreds of millions.

Peter Pan went public domain. The money from the copyright had been funding a children's hospital or orphanage. They lost the income when it hit public domain.

China is notorious for ignoring intellectual property law. There are even entire fake Apple stores there.

Software company spends a hundred million to develop Halo 5. Without piracy laws, why would they bother?

Musicians have been forced to change their models for Income. Most make money these days by touring or licensing music. Napster changed that business forever.

This is how I make my living through these property rights you say don't exist.

Think the problem is the ease of theft. If people could steal gas by surfing the net anonymously and stealing gas, they'd do it.







first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram