Started By
Message

re: Poz on Hamilton and Pujols

Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278671 posts
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:58 pm to
So no thoughts on my examples?

You come up with a group of players based off how well they play in one particular season.

Did the fact Emil brown and Gary Matthews on your list not say "wait, this isn't going to make much sense."

Again I'm not saying players don't decline with age. But look at all the great players I listed and how they were able to continue to hit.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/19/12 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

So no thoughts on my examples?

sure. Some players age well. It happens. No one says it doesn't. I'm talking about on average, so instead of taking the cherry picked best examples, I looked at the top five producers in 2006 and see how they did the last five seasons (2007-2012). Your argument was that more recent players don't have the same decline as players from the 80s or 90s. So I tested that theory against the most recently completed 5-season timeperiod.

quote:

You come up with a group of players based off how well they play in one particular season.

that was the article's thesis. It works for any season. The article used 1988 (and also used WAR, I changed it to OPS+ due to my dislike of WAR). You argued against that thesis saying recent times have changed that due to advances in health and nutrition. So I used 2006, the most recent year we could use and have a full five-year lookback.

And the theory held.

quote:

Did the fact Emil brown and Gary Matthews on your list not say "wait, this isn't going to make much sense."

No, it rather supported my theory that players decline faster than we like to think. The fact Emil Brown was in the top five Age 31 players in 2006 shows how quickly players age. We scrape the barrel pretty quickly. Though I did use six players in the Age 32 group, mainly so I could throw out Emil and use Damon. But I included Emil Brown as part of the study in the interest of both honesty and completeness.

I'm not cherry picking data. I honestly didn't know what it would say. To be honest, I expected some players to improve. I was honestly surprised ALL declined.

And guy like Abreu, Damon, and Nomar WERE great players. Are we arguing that the age 32 group there isn't full of great players. Todd Helton wasn't great?

This rather supports another on of my pet theories: I hate when people knock players for being "mere compilers". It's really HARD to be a compiler. It's tough to continue to be good enough to hang on and keep a starting job and keep producing in your mid to late 30s. Only truly great players can usually do it.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278671 posts
Posted on 12/19/12 at 1:32 pm to
lets use some of my players OPS+ for the same criteria

chipper jones

31 season: OPS+ 137
32-36: 152 (got MVP votes 4 different times after 31...34, 35, 36, 40. )


Manny Ramirez

31 season: 160
32=36: 152(had 3 top 5 MVP finishes, 32,33,36. 3 silver slugers. 5 all star games. all after 31)


Edgar Martinez

31 season : was hurt his 31 season
32-36: 4 out of the top 5 OPS+ season in his career came after age 31

Jim Thome

31 season: 197 (which was career high and led all baseball)
32-36: 145 (which is vicinity of top 10 yearly). (top 5 MVP finish at 32..Also got MVP votes at 33, 35, and 39 yrs old)


Paul Konerko

31 season: 116
32-36: 130 (top 5 in MVP age 34...also got MVP votes at 35)


Frank thomas

31 season: 125
32-36: 144 (finished top 5 in MVP twice after age 31...age 38 even)


Gary Sheffield

31 season: 176 (2nd best of career)
32-36: 149 (again like Thome, a top 10 league mark..finished top 3 in MVP twice during this time)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram