- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poz on Hamilton and Pujols
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:55 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:55 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
i'm not a fan of WAR, so let's use OPS+ for players with at least 400 AB's. The last year we can get a five-year lookahead is 2006. So let's look at how the best 31 and 32 year olds in 2006 did in 2007-2012, to test your recency theory:
I took the top-5 31 and 32 year olds in OPS+ (with at least 400 AB) in 2006 and see how they did over the next five years. It's a rough way to get us to the top performing 31 and 32 year olds and how they did in the most recently completed five-year period.
1
Posted on 12/19/12 at 12:58 pm to Baloo
So no thoughts on my examples?
You come up with a group of players based off how well they play in one particular season.
Did the fact Emil brown and Gary Matthews on your list not say "wait, this isn't going to make much sense."
Again I'm not saying players don't decline with age. But look at all the great players I listed and how they were able to continue to hit.
You come up with a group of players based off how well they play in one particular season.
Did the fact Emil brown and Gary Matthews on your list not say "wait, this isn't going to make much sense."
Again I'm not saying players don't decline with age. But look at all the great players I listed and how they were able to continue to hit.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News