Started By
Message

re: Poz on Hamilton and Pujols

Posted on 12/18/12 at 5:11 pm to
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 12/18/12 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

don't think anyone would chose the older guys vs the younger guys in 5 years.

It's not who will be more valuable in five years, but who will be more valuable over the next five years. From today until 5 years from now, who will be more valuable over their span?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72058 posts
Posted on 12/18/12 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

It's not who will be more valuable in five years, but who will be more valuable over the next five years. From today until 5 years from now, who will be more valuable over their span?


My bad, I'm dyslexic.

Hosmer could eclipse the vets numbers as soon as this season and win an MVP. Not really a crazy comparison IMO
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278674 posts
Posted on 12/18/12 at 5:47 pm to
So baloo, you always say the player is still a prospect until he really proves himself. Usually when a player is traded(wil Myers recently)

That's pretty much what Hosmer is at this point. No doubt very talented. But you are telling me right now you'd take 2 prospects over 2 guys who have each finished top 5 in an MVP voting the last 2 seasons....

I just want to get that straight.... That's not even getting into Salvador Perez... A sabermetricians nightmare with that OBP.

A guy like Hamilton 43 HR 128RBI last year....again people talking like he has already fell off a cliff.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram