Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Who do u guys want this draft?

Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:22 am
Posted by Bigcurly2343
Member since Nov 2012
136 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:22 am
I like muhammad and zeller for a top 5 pick. if we are around 8 or 9 i think we look at someone like macadoo or marcus smart. I dont think that we will go after noel because he is a replica of davis with less of an offensive game
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
179315 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:25 am to
quote:

muhammad
Posted by WB504
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
6140 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:40 am to
I'd rather trade the pick if we aren't in the top 3.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130607 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:51 am to
Way to early. A this point last year, Drummond and Davis were fighting it out for 1 and 2 in a lot of mocks. A lot happens over the course of a year, and over the course the NCAA tournament, etc.

We have no clue what our record is going to be because we haven't even played at full strength.

But to answer the question:

Shabazz has got to be near the top of most lists. Perfect fit for us: nice size, would be a scorer at SF which we desperately need. He has potential to be a special SF. You've got to think that if he was on the board when the Hornets pick, it will be him.

Honestly, we are bad enough to take a look at most positions.

We could look at McCollum at PG. Ben McLemore at SG.

And keep an eye out for the Euro Rudy Gobert, 7'1" Center prospect. And obviously Cody Zeller at Center (he could go #1).
Posted by bddwolfpack
NYC
Member since Sep 2010
9407 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 11:59 am to
Trey Burke FTW
Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19528 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:00 pm to
We need scoring. No matter what position they play, we take them if they are legit scorers.

It's not like we're too deep at any position that any one guy wouldn't be a take. PF is the only position you could argue we don't take a guy at, but if the best available is a PF, take him.

That being said, I like Muhammad, McLemore, and McCollum, in that order.

If Noel is there I'd take him, but I bet he goes before our pick.

Pretty meh on Zeller.

Pretty meh on all the SF prospects (McAdoo, Poythress, Mitchell, etc).
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27836 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:46 pm to
TB3
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23263 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

I like muhammad and zeller


Is that right?
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
41251 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:49 pm to
LeBron if we can get the top pick. if not, then Durant would be pretty good
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

TB3


It really all depends on when we draft and who is there, but Shabazz is #1 for our needs. If he keeps his current trajectory, Burke could end up #2 for me. The guys just seems to be what we need. However, that pretty much kills the Rivers to PG experiment and could create an issue with Gordon/Rivers at the 2.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
27497 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

zeller
Posted by CovSaint53
Covington, LA
Member since Oct 2012
368 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:30 pm to
I wouldn't mind one of the top SF prospects (Shabazz, Poythress, Otto Porter).

I think Vazquez has earned the right (so far) to keep the starting job for another year at least, so I don't think we should go for a PG.

That being said, best player available is always a good way to go
Posted by Macintosh
Lane State University
Member since Sep 2011
56606 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:39 pm to
Shavon coleman
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

It really all depends on when we draft and who is there, but Shabazz is #1 for our needs. If he keeps his current trajectory, Burke could end up #2 for me. The guys just seems to be what we need. However, that pretty much kills the Rivers to PG experiment and could create an issue with Gordon/Rivers at the 2.


Could just use Rivers as a 6th man
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram