Started By
Message

re: What has been most accurate in ranking the best teams: Polls, Computers or BCS?

Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71751 posts
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

The disaster that was 2003 (Oklahoma getting beaten by 28 points in the Big 12 title game and still being #1) was a direct result of the computers using margin of victory, which was why it was removed from the equation.


I thought the issue was SOS. They took the quality win bonus out of the formula.

Plus the real controversy was that a media darling got left out, and the pollsters were butthurt about it so they arranged it for the voters to override objective data.
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13136 posts
Posted on 12/16/12 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Plus the real controversy was that a media darling got left out, and the pollsters were butthurt about it so they arranged it for the voters to override objective data.

USC may well have whipped LSU in the dome that year. They were, in the words of Les Miles, undefeated in regulation. The computers are flawed, and always have been. It's the primary reason that the BCS is being shelved, and rightfully so.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram