View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
quote:
quote:
"Evaluating the totality of the evidence, there is an insufficient basis to reject Commissioner Goodell’s findings on the offer of the Favre bounty, but There was no evidence that Vilma or anyone else paid any money to any player for any bounty-related hit on an opposing player in the Vikings game."
What in the name of all things holy does this statement mean?
you see Breesus, in the nfl court of law, the nfl is right until proven wrong, and even then; they still could be right so let's just drop the whole thing.
The NFL just lawyered the shite out of the world.
re: Tags full reportPosted by Pendulum on 12/12/12 at 8:32 am to Geauxtigrs04
quote:
Seriously?
These guys make millions of dollars to play the game and you think they will play harder to get a $1,500 bonus... Dumbest comment ever
haha, I said this as well but then edited when I realized he was being facetious.
I read
quote:
Dude players who are playing for money will play alot harder than those playing for
and instantly started posting a response being like "Oh no you diiint." Then I read
quote:
free. We obviously had an advantage.
after I posted and I was like, oh sheeet, he was on my side.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News