- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: questions about ruling concerning the players
Posted on 12/11/12 at 12:32 pm to marinebioman
Posted on 12/11/12 at 12:32 pm to marinebioman
The statement was so crawfished and 2 faced i have no idea. Look at it in pieces:
"
Who the frick knows what any of that means
quote:
Tagliabue affirms factual findings of Commissioner Goodell...concludes Hargrove, Smith, Vilma "engaged in conduct detrimental"
quote:
vacates all player discipline.
"
quote:
Unlike Saints' broad organizational misconduct, player appeals involve sharply focused issues of alleged individual player misconduct in several different aspects.
quote:
My affirmation of Commissioner Goodell's findings could certainly justify...the issuance of fines.
quote:
However, this entire case has been contaminated by the coaches and others in the Saints' organization."
Who the frick knows what any of that means
1
Posted on 12/11/12 at 12:35 pm to Breesus
I agree with you Breesus. I think this slightly favors Saints. Maybe beefs up Vilmas defamation suit?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News