- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Curtis vs. Rummel
Posted on 12/21/12 at 1:17 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 12/21/12 at 1:17 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
hey might be the best team, but the issue is they haven't done as much to prove it as the GA, CA, or TX state champions
you can even argue Rummel had a harder schedule
Exactly. Curtis had to be up for two or three games this year: The 2A state final and the first two games of the season against St. Paul's and Plant, Fla.Plant and St. Paul's played in high classifications, but both were eliminated early in their respective state playoff races.
No way Curtis should be rewarded for that schedule. I know it's not their fault and if they had their way, they would have been able to prove it in 4A against the likes of Karr and Neville, but their schedule simply doesn't measure up to other teams out there who are unbeaten.
It's the SEC vs. MAC argument at the high school level. You could put 2001 Miami in the MAC right now and I'd still say Alabama would deserve to be ahead of them in the BCS because of strength of schedule. Same thing here.
Posted on 12/21/12 at 1:50 pm to CourseyCorridor
I sense a lot of mad in this thread. Its ok
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News