Started By
Message

re: How is Bielema not a terrible hire...?

Posted on 12/10/12 at 1:03 pm to
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12458 posts
Posted on 12/10/12 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

since you change them a complete 180 to claim BB to be a "great" hire i guess not.


No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

Essentially, in your simple, simple mind: All sickness = death. There is no grey area. There is no middle ground. There is only black and white.

I said we would be best served with coach "A," having certain qualifications. WHICH, by the way, is completely irrelevant. Let me put this in terms you can understand, you poor Louisiana trash. If you say you prefer ice cream, does that mean you think cake sucks? Of course not.

quote:

And just because you did 'the best you could do' with the hire doesn't make it a great hire. It means there was a weak pool of candidates and you got one of the better ones available; again i like the hire. calling it great is a stretch unless you have low expectations. which you do.


I'd ask you, once again, to name me someone we could have hired that would have had a better resume than Bielema...I'd ask, but since your pussy arse can't, or won't, answer, I'm going to stop. Because it's embarrassing.

Step up. You're sooooooooooo fricking brilliant, no? NAME SOMEONE, genius.

Lower expectations? Bielema's done more at Wisconsin than anyone in their history. Remind me. Why was Les Miles a great coach at OSU even though he only won 57% of his games there. Why was that? Something about...oh yes. How BAD it was before him? That speaks to RELATIVITY. It was BAD before him. He made them respectable, to the tune of 7-5 in his last year (bravo, truly amazing).

So let's apply some RELATIVITY to Bielema. Relatively speaking, in a state with no talent, at a school with shitty facilities, he's put a lot of guys in the NFL and had pretty good success in the B1G. He took over from their coaching "legend" and took them to new heights. Those are facts. That's not me being a flaming, trolling bitch. Those are empirical, hard facts.

Will he do great at Arkansas? WHO THE frick KNOWS. We could hire Nick fricking Saban and I'd say the exact same thing. It will depend. It all depends. Will he be able to put together a great staff (since he couldn't pay his assistants at Wisconsin f'ing anything). Will any of them have recruiting ties to the south? These are things that I'm assuming were discussed prior to his hiring and that Jeff Long had assurances on.
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23075 posts
Posted on 12/10/12 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

I said we would be best served with coach "A," having certain qualifications
you were talking about "fit" and how important that was. BB has virtually none of the necessary items to "fit" but now that doesn't matter so you pretty much have no idea what you're talking about. All sickness doesn't equal death but all of your opinions suck.

'here's what we need to be successful at Arkansas....unless we do the complete opposite and then that'll be good too.'

quote:

I'd ask you, once again, to name me someone we could have hired that would have had a better resume than Bielema
I already said that of a weak talent pool you did probably the best you could have done overall. that doesn't automatically elevate BB from good to great status only because he was the best you could do at the time.

And since you brought up Les Miles he was not a great hire at the time.
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 12/10/12 at 1:39 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram