- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SOA Season 5 Finale
Posted on 12/6/12 at 12:52 pm to Lsut81
Posted on 12/6/12 at 12:52 pm to Lsut81
quote:
I think that the DEA guy recorded Tara talking about it and turned her in after his route with Otto failed.
Most likely would be ruled inadmissible evidence in a California court. If this is all they have then they have nothing.
In fact, the the Donal Logue character would more likely find himself jammed up under the law. We have a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy.
4
Posted on 12/6/12 at 6:17 pm to Jay Quest
The Pope death scene was incredible. Waited all year for that moment. Great finish to the season. Good stuff.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 6:25 pm to Jay Quest
Right but if he now knows to get the surveillance tapes for instance, it could start the process.
Posted on 12/6/12 at 11:11 pm to Jay Quest
quote:
Most likely would be ruled inadmissible evidence in a California court. If this is all they have then they have nothing.
In fact, the the Donal Logue character would more likely find himself jammed up under the law. We have a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Depends on state law. In Louisiana as long as one of the parties being recorded is aware of the recording, it's admissible (or at least it was when I took my law class sometime pre-2005).
Posted on 12/7/12 at 8:40 am to Jay Quest
quote:
Most likely would be ruled inadmissible evidence in a California court. If this is all they have then they have nothing.
In fact, the the Donal Logue character would more likely find himself jammed up under the law. We have a right to a reasonable expectation of privacy.
You might be right, but what I like about his character is that he doesn't really give a shite. He's going to do it anyway, and break the rules on his side to make it work.
I love when shows set up a sympathetic antagonist. He isn't a Fed who just wants to make a career move by taking down the Sons, he's a renegade who wants to avenge the murder of his sister. It sounds weird, but I hope they don't give us many reasons to not like him.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News