Started By
Message

re: Nice 22 rifles

Posted on 11/29/12 at 8:46 am to
Posted by Hawgon
Texas
Member since Feb 2011
1223 posts
Posted on 11/29/12 at 8:46 am to
quote:

How can you not include the henry? Having handled all three of these, the henry is probably the nicest. The marlin 39A's are very nice, but not nearly what they used to be.


Because they have a pot metal receiver and lots and lots and lots of plastic in the internal parts. The receiver isn't even blued, it is painted. And they wear out MUCH MUCH faster than the Browning or the Marlin.

They've been making the Marlins for a hundred years. You don't need to buy a new one. You can buy one made 40 years ago that is better than anything you can buy today.

And none of that is to say that the Henry isn't a nice little rifle. All I'm saying is that it is an heirloom rifle. If used heavily, it won't last long enough to pass on to a son and just isn't in the same class as the others.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 11/29/12 at 8:52 am to
I should have been clearer. I was refering to the golden boy which isn't made to be affordable like the standard henry.

I'm a huge marlin fan and the older 39A's are incredibly nice. The new ones just don't have the same feel as the pre-safety models.

The only browning I've shot was very nice.

It's almost a crime to buy something other than a lever action .22 for an heirloom IMO
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram