Started By
Message

re: Where Are They Now? (Former Hornet Edition)

Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:15 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96438 posts
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I can't see how it's anything but great, but it has its detractors. Some wants the amnesty used on one and a salary dump trade on the other. I'm skeptical that the latter could have been done, but that's the main criticism I've heard.


I think the detractors had an inflated idea of what we could get for Ariza's expiring deal.

Frankly, this deal was about as good as we could get.


Doing things this way likely saved Benson around $14m in cash, given that Oak's value in an amnesty auction would have been low.

It also created roughly $8m in cap room to get Anderson as well as the minutes to put him, Aminu, and others on the court.
Posted by 42
Member since Apr 2012
3703 posts
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:24 am to
quote:


I think the detractors had an inflated idea of what we could get for Ariza's expiring deal.


No. The opposite, sort of. I think they thought a team would absorb him for a couple of second rounders and cash if we got an expiring back.

I think this deal was the best that could be done, especially when you take out the variability of having to rely on someone to take Ariza. This deal was completely in the hands of the team and had a good cap space / salary paid ratio (over $2 in cap space per dead dollar). It just hurts some this year . . . as in 20+% of our salary. No deal is without cost, and I'm a fan.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram