- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: After the 2nd viewing of each, TDKR >>>>>> Avengers
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:31 pm to EarthwormJim
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:31 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
That's like saying Emperor Palpatine was the main antagonist in Star Wars.
He was.
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:35 pm to Tactical1
quote:
He was
He might have been the top dog, but he wasn't the main antagonist.
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:36 pm to Tactical1
quote:
He was.
He was not. The Emperor was briefly mentioned in passing a few times in Star Wars, had a brief cameo in Empire Strikes Back, and wasn't even a huge character until Return of the Jedi. If you think Emperor Palpatine was the main antagonist in The Empire Strikes Back then you are simply saying that to support your argument.
There is a difference between being the leader and the main antagonist. They can be two different people in a movie. Blofeld's organization was behind Dr. No in the first James Bond movie but Dr. No was the main antagonist. The same thing goes for From Russia with Love. Blofeld's organization was behind the events of the film but Grant, one of his agents, was the main villain of the movie.
This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 2:39 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News