Started By
Message

re: After the 2nd viewing of each, TDKR >>>>>> Avengers

Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

That's like saying Emperor Palpatine was the main antagonist in Star Wars.


He was.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

He was


He might have been the top dog, but he wasn't the main antagonist.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

He was.



He was not. The Emperor was briefly mentioned in passing a few times in Star Wars, had a brief cameo in Empire Strikes Back, and wasn't even a huge character until Return of the Jedi. If you think Emperor Palpatine was the main antagonist in The Empire Strikes Back then you are simply saying that to support your argument.

There is a difference between being the leader and the main antagonist. They can be two different people in a movie. Blofeld's organization was behind Dr. No in the first James Bond movie but Dr. No was the main antagonist. The same thing goes for From Russia with Love. Blofeld's organization was behind the events of the film but Grant, one of his agents, was the main villain of the movie.

This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 2:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram